Last week, representatives of Nigeria’s political parties and its
electoral commission met in Abuja. At the end of a marathon meeting,
Attahiru Jega of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)
announced that the country’s general elections would be postponed by six
weeks.
Trust Nigerians: Reactions to the development fell along partisan
lines. It had been clear for some time that President Goodluck Jonathan
and his inner circle were desperate to reschedule the election, the
reason being the failure of the incumbent president’s campaign to gain
traction. So many of the president’s supporters – seeing an opportunity
to re-set the clock, buy time, and re-strategise – took to justifying
the postponement.
On the other hand, partisans of the opposition All Progressives
Congress (APC) abominated the decision. For them, the decision
represented a stealing of their party’s and presidential candidate’s
momentum, a form of electoral heist, a veritable effort to subvert the
will of their Nigerian electorate.
Other Nigerians opted to occupy the middle of a riven, contentious
divide. Seeking to project themselves as realists, these “centrists”
argued that there was simply no way the elections could have gone on the
erstwhile timetable. Hundreds of thousands of voters had not received
their permanent voters cards. Hundreds of thousands of voters in
Nigeria’s terror-plagued northeast are displaced from their homes,
living in shambolic refugee quarters within Nigeria and even in
neighboring countries. Large swathes of territory in that zone of
Nigeria are under the occupation of Boko Haram, or susceptible to
capture by the group’s well-armed fighters. How can elections hold as
scheduled when those Nigerians caught under the “Caliphate” of Islamist
insurgents are certain to be disenfranchised?
Whether one sees the postponement as justified or not, the
implications of the development are far more troubling than the warring
partisans on either side – and the ostensible realists – appear to
realise or willing to admit. I’d suggest that the decision was, above
all, a moment of national undressing. As the world looked on, Nigeria’s
political class removed the mask their country has worn for so long.
They exposed their and their country’s sordid underbelly. To borrow the
fresh phrase of an uneducated, rustic Nigerian politician, “Everything
has nakeded itself.”
There’s nothing more exasperating than to listen to Nigerians,
especially public officials or their hirelings, who insist that our
country is a coherent entity. These official apologists are quick to
euphemise Nigeria’s myriad crises, as mere teething problems. Yes, they
have since retreated from the days of proclaiming their country the
“giant of Africa,” but these custodians of an inflated national
narrative are yet to come to terms with the reality that – to paraphrase
Wole Soyinka – there’s no nation in the space called Nigeria.
A few days ago, a friend told me that the Nigerian elections needed
to be postponed in order to avert the fulfillment of the prediction by
some US intelligence experts that Nigeria could fracture by 2015. My
response: The postponement of the elections is confirmation that Nigeria
has already fallen to pieces. We who think there is an extant cohesive
Nigeria are mere stubborn believers in a will-o-the wisp.
There’s no way to dissect the postponement to make it look good. If
it’s the case that President Jonathan used his powers of incumbency to
force the shifting of the date for elections, then we’re looking at a
dire situation. In a settled – that is to say, ideologically and
structurally sound – political community, no one man, however high his
office, would be able to blackmail his way to a self-serving
postponement of elections. In fact, if Nigeria were a nation, no one
person or party would dare demand that elections be postponed to serve
their selfish, partisan ends. Even the mere entertainment of the thought
would spell doom for the person or political party.
Clearly, INEC was ill prepared for the elections. How else can one
explain the commission’s failure to put voters cards in the hands of
hundreds of thousands of eligible voters? This kind of deliberate
ineptitude bespeaks the wretchedness of Nigeria as an idea and entity.
It’s not as if INEC officials woke up two weeks ago and were told,
surprise, surprise, to start planning elections. They knew as far back
as four years ago – the last time Nigeria held general elections – that
this election cycle would arrive. So, why did the commission fail to do
even the basic things? If Nigeria were a society where patriotic pride
is part of the national tradition, where citizenship means something
vital, Mr. Jega and his management would have tendered their letters of
resignation en masse – and exited the INEC building in bowed, shamed
heads. Their incompetence would have provoked outrage all around.
The displaced, disenfranchised voters of the northeast of Nigeria
present a conundrum. Yet, to exploit their state to justify the
postponement of elections is to enter into uncertain, dangerous
territory. If these roaming refugees must be resettled in their homes
before elections are to hold, then we might as well perpetually put off
the elections. Nobody in Nigeria knows when our military would be able
to rise to the challenge of reclaiming the territories seized by Boko
Haram. For that matter, nobody knows if that’s ever going to happen.
Let me suggest that Nigeria’s postponement of elections is not a new
watermark of incompetence and failure. It is only our display to the
world of the depths of our shamelessness, our mediocrity and our lack of
seriousness. Despite our politicians’ rhetoric, Nigeria is rotten
through and through. And now we are exhibiting our grotesque sore to the
rest of the world.
If anybody was in doubt that Nigeria is a contraption maintained to
serve the greed of a few, I hope the sordid drama of elections has
dispelled it. In the last two weeks, we have witnessed the ratcheting up
of violent, partisan rhetoric on several sides. It’s all about which
self-selected camp of Nigeria’s misruling class will preside over the
looting of the country’s fast disappearing assets. They will sacrifice
the lives of innocent Nigerians to serve their greed.
If elections can be easily postponed, why don’t Nigerians propose
something even more radical? Why must we continue to support a
Presidency whose annual feeding budget exceeds what’s spent on the
education of students in several universities put together? Why must we
keep paying each of our national legislators millions of dollars each
year just so they can tell ministerial nominees to “bow and go”?
Let’s demand the dismantling of this awful edifice that’s been
misnamed “democracy.” No, I am NOT calling for military rule – I am
deeply opposed to that idea. Instead, for a period of at least two
years, let’s put Nigeria in the hands of a caretaker group of
technocrats nominated by students, workers, peasants, and professional
groups. The caretaker group’s major task should be the refashioning of
Nigeria. That would entail addressing broad issues (of citizenship and
national ethos) as well as practical ones. There’s no justification for
Nigeria to have full-time legislators. There’s no reason to have the
most expansive immunity clause in the world. There’s no logic to handing
millions of dollars each month to governors or the president in the
name of security vote.
Source: Sunnewsonline.com
No comments:
Post a Comment